CrabTrawler

Forums => Art => Topic started by: skuspar on February 15, 2012, 03:28:12 PM

Title: Photography thread
Post by: skuspar on February 15, 2012, 03:28:12 PM
yeah b/w negatives have to be sent to melbourne to, i think, the only company left in australia that develops it for a reasonable price and it takes minimum 2 weeks. colour is speedier, maybe 3-5 days and that stays in sydney but has to be outsourced to some independent place no matter where you give your films in. so stupid. 

in singapore colour negatives take 1 hour still so... i don't get it, why did everyone here sell their colour machines? where did they go? can i buy one?  :cry:

but yeah, i'm the same, bjr, i did not appreciate singapore's service until i left for good. you barely have to wait for anything, ever, even the little things like a post office being open until 7pm and banks until 10pm made life muchhhh easier with a full time job. it's no wonder australians are so cranky... everything is a god damn hassle.
my building at work has a half dozen fuji frontier machines and a color negative developer.  Figure out how to move em and you got yourself a photo machine!
Title: Re: Re: Recent Purchases
Post by: Sully on February 15, 2012, 03:34:38 PM
 :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry:
Title: Re: Re: Recent Purchases
Post by: ~MM~ on February 15, 2012, 08:37:04 PM
yeah b/w negatives have to be sent to melbourne to, i think, the only company left in australia that develops it for a reasonable price and it takes minimum 2 weeks. colour is speedier, maybe 3-5 days and that stays in sydney but has to be outsourced to some independent place no matter where you give your films in. so stupid. 

in singapore colour negatives take 1 hour still so... i don't get it, why did everyone here sell their colour machines? where did they go? can i buy one?  :cry:

but yeah, i'm the same, bjr, i did not appreciate singapore's service until i left for good. you barely have to wait for anything, ever, even the little things like a post office being open until 7pm and banks until 10pm made life muchhhh easier with a full time job. it's no wonder australians are so cranky... everything is a god damn hassle.
my building at work has a half dozen fuji frontier machines and a color negative developer.  Figure out how to move em and you got yourself a photo machine!
Office Space Printer Scene (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dN3v0drnTdQ#ws)

?
Title: Re: Re: Recent Purchases
Post by: lucifer on February 15, 2012, 09:36:40 PM
I'm not a big fan of C-41 negatives, myself. I'll take slide films over those any day.

That said, there are some amazing photographers using c-41 colour films.
Title: Re: Re: Recent Purchases
Post by: Sully on February 16, 2012, 02:49:17 AM
yeah... i guess it's just a preference. i only ever took 3 rolls of slide film and they were wayyy too rich in colour / tone for me but that would also probably be reliant on the brand too, right? i don't know anything about slides.
Title: Re: Re: Recent Purchases
Post by: lucifer on February 16, 2012, 11:32:18 AM
yeah... i guess it's just a preference. i only ever took 3 rolls of slide film and they were wayyy too rich in colour / tone for me but that would also probably be reliant on the brand too, right? i don't know anything about slides.

Yea, it depends on the brand (for example, Velvia wil have richer colour than elitechrome or whatever, but it also costs at least 10) but slides in general are more colourful than c-41 color film.

I mostly shoot b&w though. I'm doing lots of street photography now and in 90% of the cases colour is just an necessary distraction.  :P
And like you said, it basically all about preferences.

EDIT: you can also always get color film cross-processed for more "hipster" look. :P
Title: Re: Re: Recent Purchases
Post by: TomWaits on February 16, 2012, 11:45:22 AM
yeah... i guess it's just a preference. i only ever took 3 rolls of slide film and they were wayyy too rich in colour / tone for me but that would also probably be reliant on the brand too, right? i don't know anything about slides.

Yea, it depends on the brand (for example, Velvia wil have richer colour than elitechrome or whatever, but it also costs at least 10) but slides in general are more colourful than c-41 color film.

I mostly shoot b&w though. I'm doing lots of street photography now and in 90% of the cases colour is just an necessary distraction.  :P
And like you said, it basically all about preferences.

EDIT: you can also always get color film cross-processed for more "hipster" look. :P

Well there are scenes in which a black and white image will lack some contrast, at least in my opinion. Of course you can tweak a bit during the development, but I do believe this is true. But for instance for cityscapes, I like black and white. Perhaps I can make some photo series in Zagreb at some point and maybe we can work something out for developing them  :angel:

Btw, what's your favorite grainy black and white film?
Title: Re: Re: Recent Purchases
Post by: lucifer on February 16, 2012, 11:55:08 AM
yeah... i guess it's just a preference. i only ever took 3 rolls of slide film and they were wayyy too rich in colour / tone for me but that would also probably be reliant on the brand too, right? i don't know anything about slides.

Yea, it depends on the brand (for example, Velvia wil have richer colour than elitechrome or whatever, but it also costs at least 10) but slides in general are more colourful than c-41 color film.

I mostly shoot b&w though. I'm doing lots of street photography now and in 90% of the cases colour is just an necessary distraction.  :P
And like you said, it basically all about preferences.

EDIT: you can also always get color film cross-processed for more "hipster" look. :P

Well there are scenes in which a black and white image will lack some contrast, at least in my opinion. Of course you can tweak a bit during the development, but I do believe this is true. But for instance for cityscapes, I like black and white. Perhaps I can make some photo series in Zagreb at some point and maybe we can work something out for developing them  :angel:

True. If you look at this guy's (amazing) photos from Nepal http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=114076 (http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=114076) (he posted them throughout the pages), slide film works perfectly. In such colourful places with those subjects, shooting b&w or converting it to b&w, the photos would lose the impact on the viewer in most cases, IMO.

Yea, we could work something out. Maybe we could have a walk around Zagreb one day, taking photos. :)
Title: Re: Re: Recent Purchases
Post by: TomWaits on February 16, 2012, 12:01:21 PM
yeah... i guess it's just a preference. i only ever took 3 rolls of slide film and they were wayyy too rich in colour / tone for me but that would also probably be reliant on the brand too, right? i don't know anything about slides.

Yea, it depends on the brand (for example, Velvia wil have richer colour than elitechrome or whatever, but it also costs at least 10) but slides in general are more colourful than c-41 color film.

I mostly shoot b&w though. I'm doing lots of street photography now and in 90% of the cases colour is just an necessary distraction.  :P
And like you said, it basically all about preferences.

EDIT: you can also always get color film cross-processed for more "hipster" look. :P

Well there are scenes in which a black and white image will lack some contrast, at least in my opinion. Of course you can tweak a bit during the development, but I do believe this is true. But for instance for cityscapes, I like black and white. Perhaps I can make some photo series in Zagreb at some point and maybe we can work something out for developing them  :angel:

True. If you look at this guy's (amazing) photos from Nepal http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=114076 (http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=114076) (he posted them throughout the pages), slide film works perfectly. In such colourful places with those subjects, shooting b&w or converting it to b&w, the photos would lose the impact on the viewer in most cases, IMO.

Yea, we could work something out. Maybe we could have a walk around Zagreb one day, taking photos. :)

Apparently you were already replying while I was editing my message, so: Btw, what's your favorite grainy black and white film?

And yeah, a photo shoot would be nice. I know some nice places to take photos. We can do a full tour :)
I would be in Croatia really soon though, probably in June the earliest. I'll check out the photo link you posted during my lunch break today.
Title: Re: Re: Recent Purchases
Post by: lucifer on February 16, 2012, 12:15:37 PM
yeah... i guess it's just a preference. i only ever took 3 rolls of slide film and they were wayyy too rich in colour / tone for me but that would also probably be reliant on the brand too, right? i don't know anything about slides.

Yea, it depends on the brand (for example, Velvia wil have richer colour than elitechrome or whatever, but it also costs at least 10) but slides in general are more colourful than c-41 color film.

I mostly shoot b&w though. I'm doing lots of street photography now and in 90% of the cases colour is just an necessary distraction.  :P
And like you said, it basically all about preferences.

EDIT: you can also always get color film cross-processed for more "hipster" look. :P

Well there are scenes in which a black and white image will lack some contrast, at least in my opinion. Of course you can tweak a bit during the development, but I do believe this is true. But for instance for cityscapes, I like black and white. Perhaps I can make some photo series in Zagreb at some point and maybe we can work something out for developing them  :angel:

True. If you look at this guy's (amazing) photos from Nepal http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=114076 (http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=114076) (he posted them throughout the pages), slide film works perfectly. In such colourful places with those subjects, shooting b&w or converting it to b&w, the photos would lose the impact on the viewer in most cases, IMO.

Yea, we could work something out. Maybe we could have a walk around Zagreb one day, taking photos. :)

Apparently you were already replying while I was editing my message, so: Btw, what's your favorite grainy black and white film?

And yeah, a photo shoot would be nice. I know some nice places to take photos. We can do a full tour :)
I would be in Croatia really soon though, probably in June the earliest. I'll check out the photo link you posted during my lunch break today.

Probably Kodak Tri-X 400. It has this great grainy look, and it's perfect for push processing. You can easily do 12800, or even a bit higher, which is pretty fucking amazing considering it normally a 400 iso film.

Ilford HP5+ is pretty great, too. Albeit not very grainy, if you're looking for that. I've pushed it to 3200 and as you can see below (or not, it's a small photo and it looks much better on paper), not much grain.
(http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5268/5553674479_cd486c9faf_z.jpg) (http://www.flickr.com/photos/valjhun/5553674479/)

EDIT: this conversation should probably be moved to the Art forum?
Title: Photography thread
Post by: TomWaits on February 16, 2012, 12:16:57 PM
So Luci, to continue about the black/white photo shoot...

I'm not sure which film camera would be best to take:

This one...
(http://zwee1.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/cheap-canon-ae-1.jpg)

or this one...
(http://www.collection-appareils.fr/minolta/images/minolta_dynax_500si.jpg)
Title: Re: Photography thread
Post by: lucifer on February 16, 2012, 12:23:00 PM
This one  :ehehe:
(http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Arts/Arts_/Pictures/2009/7/20/1248083122059/Leica-M6-camera-002.jpg)

Do you own those two or would you buy them? If you own them, take the one with better lens? (or take Canon because it's prettier :P)
Title: Re: Photography thread
Post by: TomWaits on February 16, 2012, 01:06:22 PM
This one  :ehehe:
(http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Arts/Arts_/Pictures/2009/7/20/1248083122059/Leica-M6-camera-002.jpg)

Do you own those two or would you buy them? If you own them, take the one with better lens? (or take Canon because it's prettier :P)

I own both.

I've actually been tempted to buy an older professional film camera, something like:
(http://www.mir.com.my/rb/photography/hardwares/classics/eos/EOS-1n/images/CanonEOS1Nbooster50mm.jpg)
(Since it's an EOS, my Canon FD lenses won't fit unfortunately)
Title: Re: Photography thread
Post by: lucifer on February 16, 2012, 01:14:00 PM
What FD lenses do you have?
Title: Re: Photography thread
Post by: TomWaits on February 16, 2012, 01:20:01 PM
What FD lenses do you have?

2x (I believe) 50mm, 300mm tele, and a macro ring, I believe. Pourquoi?
Title: Re: Photography thread
Post by: lucifer on February 16, 2012, 01:24:13 PM
What FD lenses do you have?

2x (I believe) 50mm, 300mm tele, and a macro ring, I believe. Pourquoi?

Hve you considered buying a camera with FD mount? Although I guess manual focusing on SLR can be a bitch.
Title: Re: Photography thread
Post by: TomWaits on February 16, 2012, 01:29:38 PM
What FD lenses do you have?

2x (I believe) 50mm, 300mm tele, and a macro ring, I believe. Pourquoi?

Hve you considered buying a camera with FD mount? Although I guess manual focusing on SLR can be a bitch.

I dunno man...EOS has been around for a long time now, so the FD cameras will be rather old and you run into risk with the state of the shutter curtain and all.
But this would be an option:
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6b/T90nolens.jpg)
The T90, aka THE TANK  :ehehe:

(On a side note: the Canon T-series cameras look rather dated (I owned a T80 at some point, with a motordrive lens)...I like Minolta's design of that period much more)
Title: Re: Photography thread
Post by: lucifer on February 16, 2012, 01:32:39 PM
Yea, true. Also you could always buy an FD to EOS mount adaptor if you wanted to use those lenses.
Title: Re: Photography thread
Post by: TomWaits on February 16, 2012, 01:34:14 PM
Here, I had a T80 like this (with this lens, check out how compact it is  :bitchplease:)
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b2/Canon_T80_top.jpg)
Title: Re: Photography thread
Post by: lucifer on February 16, 2012, 01:52:20 PM
hahaha what a lens!
Title: Re: Photography thread
Post by: TomWaits on February 17, 2012, 10:03:01 AM
Luci, if I ever find a Canon EOS-1N for a decent price, I might go for it. But people seem to be selling them for 300-400 euros, still.
An alternative would be the (older) EOS-1.

The EOS-1 (hard to search for, as you'll also encounter EOS-1D's while doing searches...
(http://mir.com.my/rb/photography/hardwares/classics/eos/EOS-1/images/Jeff_EOS1_A.jpg)

The EOS-1N:
(http://www.mir.com.my/rb/photography/hardwares/classics/eos/EOS-1n/images/CanonEOS1Nbooster50mm.jpg)


In other news:
(http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2011/06/5dashtray.jpg)
Title: Re: Photography thread
Post by: lucifer on February 17, 2012, 10:17:03 AM
Surely you can get 1N cheaper. http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Canon-EOS-1-body-Canon-Power-Driver-Booster-E-1-/330683820736?pt=UK_Film_Cameras&hash=item4cfe4aaac0#ht_1037wt_1396 (http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Canon-EOS-1-body-Canon-Power-Driver-Booster-E-1-/330683820736?pt=UK_Film_Cameras&hash=item4cfe4aaac0#ht_1037wt_1396)  8)

But yea, some camera really hold their price. Especially medium format cameras like Mamiya, Hasselblad, Rolleiflex. Or 35mm ones like Leica M3-M7, which I really want, but there's pretty much no way to get just the body for under 500.
Title: Re: Photography thread
Post by: TomWaits on February 17, 2012, 10:29:32 AM
Surely you can get 1N cheaper. http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Canon-EOS-1-body-Canon-Power-Driver-Booster-E-1-/330683820736?pt=UK_Film_Cameras&hash=item4cfe4aaac0#ht_1037wt_1396 (http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Canon-EOS-1-body-Canon-Power-Driver-Booster-E-1-/330683820736?pt=UK_Film_Cameras&hash=item4cfe4aaac0#ht_1037wt_1396)  8)

But yea, some camera really hold their price. Especially medium format cameras like Mamiya, Hasselblad, Rolleiflex. Or 35mm ones like Leica M3-M7, which I really want, but there's pretty much no way to get just the body for under 500.

Hmm...interesting.

Btw, before I forgot to mention I also have this:
(http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2725/4313702843_5c54b8cc02_z.jpg)
Haven't used it so far though...bought it for, if I remember correctly, 20 Pounds in London.
Title: Re: Photography thread
Post by: lucifer on February 17, 2012, 10:50:51 AM
What kind of film goes into that thing?
Title: Re: Photography thread
Post by: TomWaits on February 17, 2012, 10:53:52 AM
What kind of film goes into that thing?

Roll film.
Title: Re: Photography thread
Post by: lucifer on February 17, 2012, 11:01:57 AM
Get some b&w film then and I can develop it for you. 8)
Title: Re: Photography thread
Post by: TomWaits on February 26, 2012, 10:26:58 PM
I've put out a bid on a Soligor wideangle for my Canon AE-1, 24mm:
(http://lh6.ggpht.com/_Fav86qiHLT0/S7kWBD-wwqI/AAAAAAAAA4c/9ks8KSDK7wQ/Soligor%2024mm%20f2.5%20front_resize.jpg)
Title: Re: Photography thread
Post by: skuspar on February 27, 2012, 12:24:17 AM
I call this "random train station in Budapest"
Title: Re: Photography thread
Post by: TomWaits on February 27, 2012, 10:15:02 AM
I call this "random train station in Budapest"

I think I've been at that station. It's the fanciest one, right? Fairly close to the main sites?

Anyway, the bid on the Soligor 24mm lens was accepted and I should receive it this week.  :ozz:
Title: Re: Photography thread
Post by: lucifer on February 27, 2012, 10:27:42 AM
Anyway, the bid on the Soligor 24mm lens was accepted and I should receive it this week.  :ozz:

Hopefully I'll receive my camera this week, too. :D
Title: Re: Photography thread
Post by: TomWaits on February 27, 2012, 10:31:50 AM
Anyway, the bid on the Soligor 24mm lens was accepted and I should receive it this week.  :ozz:

Hopefully I'll receive my camera this week, too. :D

Unless your camera purchases are CURSED!
Title: Re: Photography thread
Post by: lucifer on February 27, 2012, 10:34:34 AM
Anyway, the bid on the Soligor 24mm lens was accepted and I should receive it this week.  :ozz:

Hopefully I'll receive my camera this week, too. :D

Unless your camera purchases are CURSED!

I've got my Yashica 635 off e-bay and it worked. Well, except that the mirror got dislodged in the mail but I've mended it. 8)
Title: Re: Photography thread
Post by: TomWaits on February 27, 2012, 10:39:02 AM
CURSED!!
Title: Re: Photography thread
Post by: TomWaits on February 27, 2012, 10:44:30 AM
Oh Tomaz (or anyone else who's knowledgeable on the subject): Is this tutorial complete and useful for B/W developing?
http://www.ilfordphoto.com/Webfiles/200629163442455.pdf (http://www.ilfordphoto.com/Webfiles/200629163442455.pdf)

(of course without the mandatory use of Ilford products :P)
Title: Re: Photography thread
Post by: lucifer on February 27, 2012, 10:57:37 AM
Yeah, it's useful. Except in step 12, buying stop bath solution is pretty pointless as you can use tap water instead. Just pour it in the tank a couple of times and you can proceed to fixing.
Here is a site with pretty much every possible B&W film/developer combination and their processing times. http://www.digitaltruth.com/devchart.php (http://www.digitaltruth.com/devchart.php) It's like a Holy Bible for developing films. :D
Title: Re: Photography thread
Post by: skuspar on February 27, 2012, 05:11:02 PM
I call this "random train station in Budapest"

I think I've been at that station. It's the fanciest one, right? Fairly close to the main sites?

Anyway, the bid on the Soligor 24mm lens was accepted and I should receive it this week.  :ozz:
you are correct sir.  No idea what the station name is but it is the main  station
Title: Re: Photography thread
Post by: Brent on February 28, 2014, 09:20:14 PM
So I have a chance to get a Canon 24-105 f/4L for $500 CAD...

I pretty much have to, right?
Title: Re: Photography thread
Post by: lucifer on March 01, 2014, 12:37:26 AM
yes
Title: Re: Photography thread
Post by: Brent on March 03, 2014, 04:16:02 AM
So I got it.

It's really nice.

Semi related: I recently got tired of the 1100D and sold it, got a 700D. Not a huge upgrade, but feels significant.

It's really shocking how sharp the images with the 24-105mm f4L and the 17-55 F2.8 are compared the T3 and the kit lens.

Fun!
Title: Re: Photography thread
Post by: TomWaits on March 03, 2014, 01:05:06 PM
So I got it.

It's really nice.

Semi related: I recently got tired of the 1100D and sold it, got a 700D. Not a huge upgrade, but feels significant.

It's really shocking how sharp the images with the 24-105mm f4L and the 17-55 F2.8 are compared the T3 and the kit lens.

Fun!

Well quality glass makes all the difference.



Even though it's still Canon...  :apio:
Title: Re: Photography thread
Post by: lucifer on March 03, 2014, 01:27:26 PM
I'd love to own a weather-sealed lens but they're all so fucking expensive! :/
Title: Re: Photography thread
Post by: Brent on March 03, 2014, 10:03:59 PM
Haha the weather sealed lens goes great with my non-weather sealed body!
Title: Re: Photography thread
Post by: lucifer on March 03, 2014, 10:18:26 PM
and my non-weather sealed lens goes great with my weather sealed body.  :/
Title: Re: Photography thread
Post by: Brent on March 03, 2014, 11:34:48 PM
and my non-weather sealed lens goes great with my weather sealed body.  :/

Haha! I figure if my body falls to that fate it's just an excuse to go upgrade/be financially irresponsible.  :mmm:
Title: Re: Photography thread
Post by: lucifer on March 04, 2014, 12:46:09 AM
and my non-weather sealed lens goes great with my weather sealed body.  :/

Haha! I figure if my body falls to that fate it's just an excuse to go upgrade/be financially irresponsible.  :mmm:

same here, just switch 'body' with 'lens' :D
Title: Re: Photography thread
Post by: Brent on November 06, 2014, 06:33:35 AM
So, I've got a major 7D Mark II boner...  :mmm:
Title: Re: Photography thread
Post by: TomWaits on November 06, 2014, 10:22:17 AM
So, I've got a major 7D Mark II boner...  :mmm:

Pft Canon.
 :troll:
Title: Re: Photography thread
Post by: lucifer on November 06, 2014, 10:28:51 AM
I have Canon 7d, nice camera.
Title: Re: Photography thread
Post by: Brent on November 06, 2014, 05:06:13 PM
Ever see the DigitalRev video where they freeze the 7D in a block of ice, then light it on fire, and it still works?
Title: Re: Photography thread
Post by: lucifer on November 06, 2014, 05:54:00 PM
Ever see the DigitalRev video where they freeze the 7D in a block of ice, then light it on fire, and it still works?

Haha yeah! The build is insanly good. I got mine wet and hit so many times and no problems.
Lenses on the other hand... have to sell before fungus comes into play haha.
Title: Re: Photography thread
Post by: Brent on November 07, 2014, 05:20:50 PM
Ever see the DigitalRev video where they freeze the 7D in a block of ice, then light it on fire, and it still works?

Haha yeah! The build is insanly good. I got mine wet and hit so many times and no problems.
Lenses on the other hand... have to sell before fungus comes into play haha.

There's a humungous fungus among us!

Also, apparently a lot of the initial test shots that went out from the 7DII in the first few days had the in-camera noise reduction on. Phew.
Title: Re: Photography thread
Post by: lucifer on November 07, 2014, 05:25:58 PM
Ever see the DigitalRev video where they freeze the 7D in a block of ice, then light it on fire, and it still works?

Haha yeah! The build is insanly good. I got mine wet and hit so many times and no problems.
Lenses on the other hand... have to sell before fungus comes into play haha.

There's a humungous fungus among us!

Also, apparently a lot of the initial test shots that went out from the 7DII in the first few days had the in-camera noise reduction on. Phew.

I've looked at the specifications od mk2 and to be honest, it's not much better than mk1.
Title: Re: Photography thread
Post by: Brent on November 12, 2014, 05:35:51 AM
Ever see the DigitalRev video where they freeze the 7D in a block of ice, then light it on fire, and it still works?

Haha yeah! The build is insanly good. I got mine wet and hit so many times and no problems.
Lenses on the other hand... have to sell before fungus comes into play haha.

There's a humungous fungus among us!

Also, apparently a lot of the initial test shots that went out from the 7DII in the first few days had the in-camera noise reduction on. Phew.

I've looked at the specifications od mk2 and to be honest, it's not much better than mk1.

Not hugely. The autofocus system is apparently nicer than it looks on paper (and it looks pretty great). Relative to sensor size, the noise performance is almost up to the quality of the D810, which for Canon is a quantum leap.

I think if anything, it bodes well for the 5D Mk IV... at least that it'll approach Nikon and Sony image quality.
Title: Re: Photography thread
Post by: TomWaits on September 21, 2016, 11:08:38 AM
LOL I TAEK PICTUR

(http://i.imgur.com/FGcllJQ.jpg)

(http://i.imgur.com/UqT76z5.jpg)

(http://i.imgur.com/kyUCb9E.jpg)
Title: Re: Photography thread
Post by: Brent on September 21, 2016, 04:11:20 PM
I'm not really a landscape guy, but THESE NOW

Title: Re: Photography thread
Post by: TomWaits on September 21, 2016, 09:12:15 PM
I'm not really a landscape guy, but THESE NOW

You can go to Banff. That's cheating.
Title: Re: Photography thread
Post by: Brent on September 22, 2016, 04:34:53 PM
I'm not really a landscape guy, but THESE NOW

You can go to Banff. That's cheating.

Yeah, it's a bit easy out there.
Title: Re: Photography thread
Post by: TomWaits on September 28, 2016, 09:31:25 AM
LOL I MAEK PICTUR AGAIN

(http://i.imgur.com/HWihh5o.png)

(http://i.imgur.com/v6EfXj0.png)

(http://i.imgur.com/bC4U5Oz.png)

(http://i.imgur.com/PdQ70G4.png)

(http://i.imgur.com/X1V6FUQ.png)

(http://i.imgur.com/zyyWwbC.png)

(http://i.imgur.com/l91RjUH.png)

(http://i.imgur.com/SrRkDHy.png)

(http://i.imgur.com/D7lSWK9.png)

(http://i.imgur.com/WyxZMGC.png)
Title: Re: Photography thread
Post by: Brent on October 03, 2016, 05:22:28 AM
Those are great. What lens are you using on the wide shots?
Title: Re: Photography thread
Post by: TomWaits on October 03, 2016, 10:42:32 AM
Those are great. What lens are you using on the wide shots?

Thanks.
For wide shots I use my Sigma 10-20mm zoom.
Title: Re: Photography thread
Post by: Brent on October 03, 2016, 05:04:20 PM
Those are great. What lens are you using on the wide shots?

Thanks.
For wide shots I use my Sigma 10-20mm zoom.

Ah, cool. Good ol Sigma.

More Banff stuff

Title: Re: Photography thread
Post by: lucifer on October 03, 2016, 09:09:31 PM
I wanna go there!

Also, I have my first solo exhibition tomorrow 😎
Title: Re: Photography thread
Post by: TomWaits on October 03, 2016, 11:58:12 PM
I wanna go there!

Also, I have my first solo exhibition tomorrow 😎

Where, and with what?
Title: Re: Photography thread
Post by: Brent on October 04, 2016, 04:26:11 AM
If any of you guys are ever in the neighbourhood, I'll take ya hiking
Title: Re: Photography thread
Post by: lucifer on October 04, 2016, 01:04:22 PM
I wanna go there!

Also, I have my first solo exhibition tomorrow 😎

Where, and with what?

In Slovenia and with photos :D
Title: Re: Photography thread
Post by: TomWaits on October 04, 2016, 01:57:47 PM
I wanna go there!

Also, I have my first solo exhibition tomorrow 😎

Where, and with what?

In Slovenia and with photos :D

What kind of photos? And in Brezice?

Also, till when does it run?
Title: Re: Photography thread
Post by: lucifer on October 04, 2016, 05:22:30 PM
I wanna go there!

Also, I have my first solo exhibition tomorrow 😎

Where, and with what?

In Slovenia and with photos :D

What kind of photos? And in Brezice?

Also, till when does it run?

Hmmm, landscapes mostly. In Brezice, yeah. It'll be there for the whole October I think.

I have to make a short speech tonight for the opening. I want to die. :cry:
Title: Re: Photography thread
Post by: TomWaits on October 05, 2016, 09:23:13 AM
I wanna go there!

Also, I have my first solo exhibition tomorrow 😎

Where, and with what?

In Slovenia and with photos :D

What kind of photos? And in Brezice?

Also, till when does it run?

Hmmm, landscapes mostly. In Brezice, yeah. It'll be there for the whole October I think.

I have to make a short speech tonight for the opening. I want to die. :cry:

Maha. I hope someone will be filming that.
Do you have any examples of what's going to be included in the exhibition? Also, photos of the exhibition or you're lying.  :mmm:
Title: Re: Photography thread
Post by: lucifer on October 05, 2016, 09:29:37 AM
lying you say?
(https://scontent-vie1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/t31.0-8/14556606_1118643234895779_8457310873045492726_o.jpg)


filming you say?
(https://scontent-vie1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/t31.0-8/14480474_1118643491562420_8011082873057454461_o.jpg)
Title: Re: Photography thread
Post by: TomWaits on October 05, 2016, 09:36:52 AM
lying you say?
(https://scontent-vie1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/t31.0-8/14556606_1118643234895779_8457310873045492726_o.jpg)


filming you say?
(https://scontent-vie1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/t31.0-8/14480474_1118643491562420_8011082873057454461_o.jpg)

You have quite a big family  :troll:

So where can we see this footage?
Title: Re: Photography thread
Post by: lucifer on October 05, 2016, 02:46:55 PM

You have quite a big family  :troll:

So where can we see this footage?

 :rofl:

Some local tv.
Title: Re: Photography thread
Post by: Brent on October 05, 2016, 03:15:59 PM

You have quite a big family  :troll:

So where can we see this footage?


 :rofl:

Some local tv.

Find it on youtube, you celebrity!
Title: Re: Photography thread
Post by: TomWaits on October 05, 2016, 11:30:44 PM

You have quite a big family  :troll:

So where can we see this footage?


 :rofl:

Some local tv.

Find it on youtube, you celebrity!

This.

Also: pretty cool. Wish I could see it but I can't (won't be in HR till December).
Title: Re: Photography thread
Post by: Brent on October 24, 2016, 05:43:29 AM
Yeah, that's really cool, man. Way to go!
Title: Re: Photography thread
Post by: rAnDolf sHitler on November 07, 2016, 07:59:28 PM
Tomaz that is AWESOME! Congratulations!!!!    :cheers:

Mr. TV Star!!!  You have an agent yet???   :D